Why Distressed Manipur Not Discussed In Indian Parliament, When It Is Being Discussed In European Parliament and America?

Why Manipur Not Discussed In Indian Parliament, When It Is Being Discussed In European Parliament and America?

The Indian Parliament is preparing for two momentous developments as the monsoon session enters its penultimate week, which might have a substantial impact on the political climate of the nation. The opposition I.N.D.I.A. alliance and the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) have filed a no-confidence motion against the Narendra Modi administration over its claimed failure to quell the ethnic hostilities that have plagued Manipur since May.

While it looks that the administration has the necessary support to reject the resolution, the opposition is adamant about ending Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s silence on this important matter. Following riots sparked by the controversial inclusion of Meiteis in the Scheduled Tribes list, Manipur, a northeastern state administered by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has been rocked by tension as well as violence. Tribal communities in the state have long fought the Meitei community’s aspiration for ST status, resulting in profound social discontent and conflicts.

The opposition parties have harshly attacked the BJP government, both at the federal and state levels, for allegedly using “divide and rule” policies that have failed to curb the increasing violence in Manipur. Despite Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s visit to the state, peace has remained elusive, causing the opposition to call Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s silence on the topic into question.

Although the no-confidence vote is expected to be defeated, it provides an important chance for the opposition to exert pressure on the government and demand accountability. They hope to force PM Modi to address the matter directly and take meaningful actions to bring peace and stability to the volatile region by pushing for a discussion on the current situation in Manipur.

In an attempt to highlight their concerns, opposition members walked out of a Parliamentary panel meeting, including notable personalities such as Congress’s Digvijaya Singh, Pradeep Bhattacharya, and Trinamool Congress’s Derek O’Brien, when their demand for a discussion of the Manipur situation was denied. The purpose of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs was to hear the perspectives of the state governments of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana on Prison – Conditions, Infrastructure, and Reforms.

In addition to causing internal tension, the situation in Manipur raises concerns about the BJP’s capacity to govern successfully in areas rife with protracted social and political unrest. The opposition’s accusations of poor management and indifference have been strengthened by the government’s silence as well as seeming lack of action.

The nation anxiously awaits to see if the Prime Minister would finally address the Manipur situation and show his government’s commitment to fixing the fundamental issues fueling the unrest as the no-confidence motion approaches. The outcome of the motion may appear to be predetermined, but the true test will be whether the government is prepared to have a meaningful conversation with the opposition and address their concerns over the peace and stability of Manipur.

The Congress party has accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of dodging questions along with shirking responsibility for what can be described as “gross mismanagement” by both the Center as well as the State administration in handling the volatile situation in Manipur, part of what seems to be a growing chorus of discontent and criticism. Since May, the continued ethnic tensions in the northeastern state have resulted in a situation of civil unrest and increasing bloodshed; yet, the Prime Minister’s silence on the subject has grown increasingly alarming.

The Deputy Leader of the Congress in the Lok Sabha, Gaurav Gogoi, compared Union Ministers and BJP leaders to “bouncers” who protect the Prime Minister from being pressed with difficult questions by the Opposition during a press conference held at the party headquarters. The Congress claims that rather than effectively addressing the problem in Manipur, the ruling party is using strategies to control public perception as well as headlines.

Home Minister Amit Shah’s willingness to participate in a discussion in the Lok Sabha was derided by Congress national secretary Jairam Ramesh as an absolutely desperate attempt to manage headlines, insisting that no one was receiving a particular favor. Additionally, the Congress has raised major concerns about Mr. Shah’s silence in response to the Opposition’s demand that PM Modi give a comment on the matter, which hastens suspicions of government hesitation.

The party is adamant that the debate regarding the violence in Manipur be held in accordance with rules 267 for the Upper House and rule 184 for the Lower House, both of which require voting. The opposition feels that there has been a lack of leadership as well as outreach during this critical period of crisis, therefore the prime minister’s request for formal political communication and participation appears to go unheeded.

Congress politicians, particularly K.C. Venugopal, have criticized the Prime Minister harshly for his refusal to answer questions directly in Parliament. Mr. Venugopal described the Parliament as dysfunctional as a result of Mr. Modi’s apparent reluctance to take on the issues brought on by the Manipur crisis. The Prime Minister is allegedly hiding behind his staff and showing no personal leadership amid a period of political unrest, according to the Congress.

The opposition claims that the country is raging as it watches murder and damage in Manipur because the administration is unable to control the situation. The resentment and rage among residents have increased as a result of the Prime Minister’s failure to make a clear declaration or take a proactive approach. Particularly when a region is gripped by civil upheaval and violence, it is imperative for the country’s leader to directly address the concerns of the people.

The Manipur issue calls for immediate response, and the prime minister’s inaction is unquestionably a source of tremendous embarrassment and sadness. An emergency of this scope demands capable leadership and serious attempts to restore peace and stability to the area. The government must put the welfare of the people of Manipur ahead of political considerations. The opposition’s request for a discussion, which is supported by its demand for the Prime Minister’s statement, is more than just a cynical political ploy; it also represents an appeal for the authorities to act honestly and transparently.

It is fundamental for the prime minister to take decisive action and demonstrate empathy for the hardships of fellow citizens because times of crises test the true mettle of a leader. The administration cannot afford to use deception and quiet as a cover. Manipur’s citizens deserve better, and the country as a whole deserves a leader who can step up to the plate and tackle urgent problems with courage as well as conviction.

Manipur discussions in European Parliament and America

In addition to capturing attention within India, the continual ethnic violence in Manipur has also aroused debate as well as criticism on a global scale. Since the outbreak of violence more than two months ago, there have been numerous reports of killings, arsons, and home destruction, raising major questions about the stability of the state and the government’s response to it.

The European Parliament took a big step by adopting a vote criticizing the “nationalistic rhetoric” used by top BJP party members in India before Prime Minister Narendra Modi left for a two-day trip to Paris. The proposal was interpreted as a criticism of how the Modi administration handled the two-month-long unrest in Manipur. This measure, however, was met with opposition in New Delhi, which condemned it as “unacceptable interference” in India’s domestic affairs.

Six parliamentary groupings submitted a joint resolution in the European Parliament expressing concern about politically motivated policies supporting Hindu majoritarianism and an upsurge in militant group activity. The resolution additionally condemned the state government’s decision to enforce curfews and restrict internet access, which hampered media reporting and information collecting by civil society organizations.

Furthermore, the European Parliament highlighted broader issues involving Indian authorities’ misuse of Indian legislation such as the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), the UAPA terror statute, as well as the Foreign Contributions Regulatory Act (FCRA). These elements of the resolution indicate growing concern on a global scale regarding the state of affairs in Manipur and cast doubt on the Indian government’s commitment to democratic values and human rights.

India responded to the motion from the European Parliament by calling it a “reflection of colonial mindset,” but such claims are unlikely to allay the rising worries voiced by western institutions and activists. According to India, the interference stems from the international community’s common obligation to safeguard human rights and foster peace in areas rife with conflict and upheaval.

The criticism is not limited to the borders of Europe alone; in the middle of these tensions, US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti offered US support in resolving the Manipur crisis, highlighting the fact that it is a human concern. Even if it is acknowledged that this is still an internal matter for India, the US’s willingness to lend support raises concerns about the seriousness of the crisis and how the rest of the world would see India’s response.

While the US and Europe have expressed their worries and denounced the situation, it is disappointing to see Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Indian Parliament remain silent about an issue that directly affects their own nation. Being an Indian, it is profoundly troubling that our elected officials and the highest levels of government in our nation have chosen to say nothing about a situation that necessitates immediate attention and action. The Manipur situation ought to act as a reminder to the Indian government to put its people’s welfare first and to show that it is dedicated to democratic principles, human rights, as well as the rule of law.

In addition to reflecting poorly on our government, remaining silent in the face of such urgent issues raises worries about its responsibility and receptivity to the needs of its own citizens. The entire world is watching, and it is beyond time for the Indian Parliament and Prime Minister Narendra Modi to break their silence, engage in the discussions, and strive for a peaceful and just conclusion for the people of Manipur.

As citizens, we must continue to speak up and demand responsibility from our elected officials. The Manipur crisis is more than just an internal issue; it is a litmus test for our country’s adherence to democratic, human rights, and social justice values. It is critical that we keep our leaders accountable and ensure that the voices of the suffering and disadvantaged in Manipur are heard, both at home and abroad.

The Manipur crisis should be viewed as a chance for India to engage meaningfully with the international community, address real concerns, and work toward a long-term, peaceful resolution to the bloodshed. A transparent and inclusive approach is required to restore individuals’ faith in the country’s commitment to democracy and human rights, both at home and abroad. Only by real efforts as well as cooperation can India effectively handle Manipur’s difficulties and progress toward a more harmonious and inclusive society.