‘Nitish Kumar Is Being Fed With Poisonous Food’: Jitan Ram Manjhi Attacks Bihar CM, Sits On Dharna

‘Nitish Kumar Is Being Fed With Poisonous Food’: Jitan Ram Manjhi Attacks Bihar CM, Sits On Dharna

The sit-in protest (dharna) by Hindustani Awam Morcha leader and former Bihar chief minister Jitan Ram Manjhi outside the chamber of Assembly Speaker Awadh Bihari Choudhary signifies a tense political situation in Bihar. Manjhi’s move follows an incident where he claims to have been humiliated by the incumbent Chief Minister Nitish Kumar.

Manjhi’s statement to reporters, suggesting a conspiracy involving someone providing poisonous substances in the food to Nitish Kumar, adds a serious and controversial dimension to the political turmoil. His comments about the alleged poisoning attempt raise questions about the political atmosphere and the relations between key leaders in Bihar.

The support extended to Manjhi by Bihar BJP leaders during the dharna indicates a potential alignment of political forces against the incumbent Chief Minister Nitish Kumar. The participation of BJP legislators in the protest further emphasizes the political significance of Manjhi’s grievances.

The reference to Nitish Kumar’s statement about women and the words used against Manjhi suggests that personal and political tensions are influencing the public discourse. The sit-in protest outside the Speaker’s chamber can be seen as a direct challenge to the current political leadership and a demand for redressal.

Overall, this development points to a complex and dynamic political landscape in Bihar, where personal and political conflicts are coming to the forefront, leading to protests and expressions of discontent by key political figures. The involvement of multiple parties and legislators underscores the potential for broader political implications stemming from these events.

The statements from Tarkishore Prasad, BJP MLA and former deputy chief minister of Bihar, reveal the party’s strong disapproval of the incident involving Chief Minister Nitish Kumar’s alleged humiliation of former CM Jitan Ram Manjhi. Prasad criticizes the Chief Minister’s behavior, deeming it extremely unfortunate, and calls for an apology from Nitish Kumar. The demand for an apology reflects the BJP’s stance on the need for respect and decorum within the political arena.

Prasad goes further to express concern about the Speaker’s silence on the issue, suggesting a perceived bias towards the ruling parties. The accusation that the Speaker, who is expected to be impartial and uphold the principles of the Bihar Assembly, was taking sides raises questions about the fairness of proceedings.

The emphasis on the equal rights and respect due to every legislator in the Bihar Assembly underscores the importance of maintaining a democratic and inclusive environment. The reference to Jitan Ram Manjhi being prevented from expressing his views on government jobs for Scheduled Castes adds a dimension of perceived suppression of democratic dialogue.

Overall, Tarkishore Prasad’s statements reflect not only the BJP’s condemnation of the incident but also its commitment to upholding democratic values, parliamentary decorum, and the fair treatment of all legislators, regardless of their political affiliations. The incident appears to have stirred discontent within the political landscape of Bihar, with the BJP asserting the need for accountability and respectful conduct in the assembly.

The ongoing tensions between Hindustani Awam Morcha (HAM) leader Jitan Ram Manjhi and Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar have escalated with Manjhi accusing Kumar of losing his mental balance. This verbal exchange occurred in the midst of the Assembly session, highlighting the strained relationship between the two political figures.

Manjhi’s statement to the media reflects his surprise and disappointment at Nitish Kumar’s behavior during the Assembly session. He suggests that Kumar’s remarks were nonsensical and indicate a departure from his usual demeanor. Manjhi goes further to speculate on the Chief Minister’s mental state, stating that Kumar may have some mental weaknesses and has lost his mental balance.

The assertion that Nitish Kumar has underestimated Jitan Ram Manjhi adds a personal dimension to the political conflict. Manjhi believes that Kumar may have assumed that, as a member of the Bhuiya-Mushar community, Manjhi would unquestioningly follow Kumar’s directives.

These comments reveal the depth of the personal and political animosity between the two leaders. Accusations of mental instability and underestimation suggest a breakdown in the mutual respect that is often expected in political discourse. The public nature of this exchange further intensifies the impact, as it becomes a matter of public record and scrutiny.

Overall, this verbal confrontation underscores the contentious nature of Bihar’s political landscape, with personal and political differences coming to the forefront during legislative sessions. The public airing of grievances between Manjhi and Kumar adds a layer of complexity to the already dynamic political environment in the state.

The response from Nitish Kumar to Jitan Ram Manjhi’s statements reveals heightened tensions and personal animosity between the two political figures. In a fit of rage, Kumar expressed regret, claiming that it was his “stupidity” that led to Manjhi becoming the Chief Minister of the state.

Kumar’s admission that his party members urged him to remove Manjhi after just two months in office suggests internal party dissatisfaction with Manjhi’s leadership. The public acknowledgment of this internal dissent adds a layer of complexity to the political dynamics within Nitish Kumar’s party.

The use of strong language, such as “stupidity,” and the expression of regret for making Manjhi the Chief Minister contribute to the intensity of the verbal exchange. Kumar’s remarks, made during a discussion on the Reservation Amendment Bill, caused commotion in the House, indicating the emotional charge surrounding the issue.

This exchange further highlights the deep-rooted personal and political differences between the two leaders. The public nature of their statements adds to the spectacle, turning their disagreements into a matter of public record and attention.

The confrontational nature of these statements reflects not only the dynamics between Kumar and Manjhi but also the broader political climate in Bihar, where personal conflicts can become central to political discourse, even in the formal setting of the legislative assembly.

The political exchange between Jitan Ram Manjhi and Nitish Kumar, followed by the response from Deputy CM Tejashwi Yadav, reflects the complex and competitive nature of politics in Bihar.

Manjhi, who is now aligned with the opposition BJP-led NDA, expressed doubts over the state government’s caste survey, contributing to the ongoing tensions between him and Nitish Kumar.

Deputy CM Tejashwi Yadav’s response acknowledges the nature of politics, where hurling allegations at each other is considered common. He brings attention to the fact that it was Nitish Kumar who initially appointed Jitan Ram Manjhi as the Chief Minister of Bihar. Yadav also suggests that the BJP’s interest in diverting attention from a recently passed bill may be a motivating factor in the unfolding political drama.

This response underscores the strategic and often tactical aspects of political discourse, where parties may use allegations and controversies to shift public attention or gain a political advantage. By emphasizing the role of Nitish Kumar in Manjhi’s ascension to the chief ministerial position and suggesting the BJP’s motives, Yadav aims to contextualize the ongoing exchange within the broader political landscape.

The statements from Tejashwi Yadav provide insight into the political narratives and counter-narratives at play in Bihar, illustrating how leaders attempt to shape public perception and influence the discourse surrounding key issues.