Russia Is Charged Of Holding Belarus Captive With Its Agreement To Put Weapons There.

Ukraine has accused Russia of destabilizing Belarus and turning it into a “nuclear prisoner” following the ruling of Vladimir Putin that Moscow has reached an agreement to install tactical nuclear weapons on Belarusian soil. Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, the country’s opposition leader in eviction, asserted this action “grossly opposes the desire of the Belarusian people” and pointed to the country’s increasing subordination under Russian domination.

The Russian president’s claims that the move would not violate non-proliferation agreements and would be compatible with similar accords that the US has with some of its European allies were dismissed in Kyiv. Oleksiy Danilov claims that the agreement is a deed toward the internal instability of Belarus and heightens public disapproval of Russia and Putin in Belarusian society. He is the head of Ukraine’s national security and defense council. Belarus has been held captive by the Kremlin, he remarked on Twitter.

Another top adviser to Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, Mykhailo Podolyak, criticized Putin’s strategy, saying the Russian leader was “too predictable.” In a comment revolving around tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, Podolyak said that he is terrified of losing and that all he can do is terrified with tactics. Russia’s nuclear bluster, according to Nato spokesperson Oana Lungescu, is dangerous and reckless. NATO is on high alert and is watching the situation. They haven’t noticed anything that would need to modify the policy about Russia’s nuclear posture.

Russia’s reference to NATO nuclear cooperation is completely false. NATO allies follow through on their international commitments. Russia has always jeopardized its promises of weapons control. During the complete invasion of Ukraine, Putin has often made nuclear threats or intensified nuclear language. However. This can be considered the first attempt when Mr Putin stated a plan to install nuclear weapons in another country.

The Russian president stated that he was reacting to the discussions with his Belarussian counterpart, Alexander Lukashenko, who he argued had long addressed the subject of nuclear deployment on his country’s part. Earlier this week, Putin threatened a retaliatory strike in response to Britain’s order that it would deliver Ukraine with armour-piercing tank shells made of depleted uranium, and he made another reference to the shells in his speech but mainly used the presence of some 100 US nuclear weapons in Europe to defend the action.

There is nothing unusual about the United States that it has been doing this for decades, according to Putin. They have had tactical nuclear weapons on the soil of their allies for a long time. Russia committed to doing the same without breaching the duties – They emphasize without breaking the international commitments on nuclear non-proliferation.

Lukashenko held a referendum in February last year to revoke Belarus’ non-nuclear status, but the opposition dismissed the impact for being weak in the context of political persecution, and the 2020 presidential election, which retained him in power, was widely identified to have been manipulated. The stationing of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia in Belarus violates the Belarusian constitution and opposes the Belarusian people’s desire to achieve the status of a non-nuclear state declared in the Belarus Declaration of State Sovereignty of 1990, according to Tsikhanouskaya.

The unwelcome trend, which makes Belarus a potential target for preventative or retaliatory attacks, was made possible by the illegal seizure of power by Lukashenko’s illegitimate management. Josep Borrell, the EU’s foreign policy leader, warned Belarus that it might face more penalties if it hosted Russian nuclear weapons. Russian nuclear weapons being stationed in Belarus would be an irresponsible step forward and a menace to the security of Europe. Belarus is still free to stop it. In a tweet, Borrell stated that the EU is set to retaliate with more measures.

As reported by the Federation of American Scientists, Moscow has 5,977 nuclear weapons in its arsenal and has long had the potential to hit a target anywhere in the world. The United States has relatively fewer, with 5,428. If the data is taken from the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, there are around 100 American nuclear weapons – airborne gravity bombs – held throughout Europe across six facilities in a handful of countries, although being under US authority.

The transfer of nuclear weapons has reportedly been a topic of conversation between Russia and Belarus for some time, the official argued.

The likelihood of escalation to nuclear war stayed “very low,” according to critics at the Washington-based Institute in the subject of the Study of War in a late report. According to them, ISW continues to believe that Putin is a risk-averse operator who constantly uses threatening methods to use nuclear weapons with no intention of carrying them out to weaken Western resolve.

The Global Initiative to End Nuclear Weapons, on the other hand, branded Putin’s declaration an exceedingly hazardous escalation. The possibility of misunderstanding or misinterpretation is quite high in the circumstances of the Ukrainian war. It stated on Twitter that sharing nuclear weapons exacerbates the situation and risks terrible humanitarian repercussions.

While the Belarusian army has not fought in Ukraine, the two countries maintain strong military cooperation. Last year, Minsk allowed Russian governance to utilize Belarusian territory to transport soldiers into Ukraine, and the two countries extended coordinated military exercises.

Putin denied that Russia was forming a military alliance with China, instead alleging that western countries were constructing a new “axis” equivalent to the cooperation formed by Germany, Italy, and Japan during World War II. Moscow will not form a military alliance with China, Putin declared on public television. Certainly, they collaborate in the field of military-technical interaction. They are not concealing this. Nothing is hidden, and nothing is isolated.

In early 2022, China and Russia inked a “no limit” collaboration agreement, just weeks before the Russian president ordered tens of thousands of brigades into the lands of Ukraine. China has refrained from criticizing Putin’s move and has promoted a Ukrainian peace proposal. The Russian president mentioned Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea as probable members of a “global Nato,” referring to a defense treaty struck by Britain and Japan earlier this year.

Conclusion.

Because of this, according to Western critics, the west is starting to construct a new axis. This novice one is somewhat equivalent to something built in the 1930s by militaristic Japan, fascist Germany, and Italy. His statements reflect his persistent attempt to infer that Nazis control Ukraine and that its western backers are hell-bent on threatening Russia. Ukraine, which was a member of the Soviet Union and was devastated by Hitler’s armies, has repeatedly dismissed those metaphors as fake pretexts for an imperial invasion war.

edited and proofread by nikita sharma