Chile Abrogates Its Tyranny Time Constitution With A Historic Decision In Favor Of A More Comprehensive Majority Rules System

Chile is embarking on a new path. The country will be drafting a new constitution. a constitution that is more egalitarian and more importantly a constitution that does not have the legacy of former dictator Augusto Pinochet. But the process is expected to belong and drawn out and the question is can Chileans overcome their differences and rise to this challenge. it’s a new dawn for Chile.

The people have spoken in no uncertain terms, they want a new constitution, one that promises equality in a rigorously capitalist society. The referendum was held on Sunday 7.5 million people turned out to vote, The highest turnout since 2012. The result came late on Monday. It was a landslide verdict, 78 of the voters demanded a new constitution, so what happens to the old one?

Chile’s old constitution was crafted by Augusto Pinochet, a despot who administered the nation from 1973 to 1990. It was drafted by individuals hand-picked by Pinochet, at that point given authenticity in a greatly fixed vote. In fact, the old constitution is still basically. Chile will hold another choice in 2022. This will choose whether the recently drafted constitution will be established or not, yet for the time being, Chileans are celebrating.

A great many individuals are celebrated in the city of Santiago. They consumed an enormous pattern of the old constitution, moved, and cheered in the focal square. The last remainder of the Pinochet period is nearly gone. Chileans covered the event by singing a farewell general.

Nations typically compose new constitutions just when wars end or when progressing to popular government. Furthermore, established shows made exclusively out of residents are essentially unfathomable. Chile shows what baffled individuals in vote based systems can accomplish when they ascend. 

“My feeling is victory, the stability of justice, years of waiting for something. now, comes the other part, the administration of this, but I know that we   are on a good path and I’m happy, I approve it.”  – Citizens on their march to victory

The referendum was the easy part, drafting a new constitution will be the real challenge there’s a rather long wish list. more noteworthy state control of the economy acknowledgment of the Mapuche indigenous populace, aggregate land, and water rights and changes to the training and wellbeing framework. Strategically, this is an immense hit to president Sebastian Pinera, a traditionalist inclining legislator. His legislature took a long time to consent to a choice notwithstanding gigantic fights in 2019. many accept his administration’s arrangements have broadened. The abundance hole in Chile apparently, Pinera invited the vote as an opportunity to make solidarity. 

“This plebiscite is not the end but the beginning of a path which we must walk together in order to agree on a new constitution for Chile. Up until now, the constitution has divided us. From now, we have to collaborate all together for the new constitution to be a great frame for unity, stability, and the future.” -Sebastián Piñera, President of Chile.

Chile is preparing for a very long time of exceptional political movement. In 2022 there will be a choice on the new constitution. This will follow intently behind the overall political race which is opened for November 2021. The fate of Chile and its leader will be on the polling firm.

“I thought it was a historic day that I wouldn’t get to see again in my lifetime. I lived through the yes or no referendum in the first presidential election. After many years of dictatorship, it seemed to me that participation was very high and the most important thing is that the newer generations made their voices heard. We’re up for discussion. Political parties and political associations are now institutionally obsolete and we all have to understand this so we have to find new paths and I think that the youth and social  organizations are fundamental for this new era” – A resident in Santiago

This constitution, that was imposed during the dictatorship was done precisely to protect a model. It was a constitution then designed with the implementation of neoliberalism in Chile. So, the revolt that started and that we have seen, they have said that the neoliberalism will start an end in chile. Chile has also a lot to do precisely with this change. Now with this desire of a radical transformation and with this necessity to change this constitution, there’s a lot of changes to makes like an institutional framework that has in all sorts of senses a privatized human social rights. 

It’s a constitution that also denies for women a right to choose a for their own bodies it’s a constitution that guarantees an estate, a subsidiary state where precisely it’s not the human rights, it’s not social rights that are in the front. But other than that private accumulation of the few, this is a very important challenge that they are starting now in chile. A challenge that people in the social movements know that must be helped through with constant mobilization because they know that what starts now is a dispute. An open dispute from different sectors, of course from the ones who are going to try to save the continuity of this model and all from all of those from the revolt and the people who are out and nowadays that they have rise precisely to change everything and the forms of how their lives have been a precursor and administrated along these 30 years, they are standing firm for a change to this.

One year back, Chileans took their outrage regarding imbalance and bad form to the roads, demanding that changing the country’s profound basic issues would require more than change. They said Chile would require another constitution with more rights and better social securities. On Oct. 25, in a mainstream choice, the remainder of the nation overwhelmingly concurred with their finding. Chile’s submission posed electors two inquiries: Should Chile assemble a protected show to compose a fresh out of the box new constitution?

Assuming this is the case, who ought to compose that constitution – a get together containing half legislative agents and half residents, or a gathering including just residents?  With 79% of the vote, Chileans requested another constitution composed exclusively of their kindred Chileans. Our examination of equitable governments and ladies’ political support clarifies why Chile’s Oct. 25 vote kicks off something new and could set a model for majority rule systems around the world.